<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 323 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270531</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the declared value of USD 120 per metric tonne for imported soda ash light, as it aligned with prevailing market rates at the time of importation. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on Customs Valuation Rules without considering Section 14(1) of the Customs Act was deemed erroneous, leading to the refund of any excess duty paid by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 323 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270531</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the declared value of USD 120 per metric tonne for imported soda ash light, as it aligned with prevailing market rates at the time of importation. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on Customs Valuation Rules without considering Section 14(1) of the Customs Act was deemed erroneous, leading to the refund of any excess duty paid by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>