<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1120 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of excess depreciation claim on temporary structures in leased premises and affirming the capital nature of improvements made by the appellant. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant tax laws and case laws, emphasizing the enduring benefits derived from the improvements in leased premises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 16:33:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1120 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of excess depreciation claim on temporary structures in leased premises and affirming the capital nature of improvements made by the appellant. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant tax laws and case laws, emphasizing the enduring benefits derived from the improvements in leased premises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>