<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1687 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177457</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi ruled in an appeal against a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for non-compliance with a notice issued under Section 142(1)/143(2). The tribunal found the time provided for compliance inadequate, as less than ten days were allowed from notice issuance to respond to a detailed questionnaire. Due to the insufficient time granted, the tribunal deemed the non-compliance not a justifiable default warranting the penalty, leading to the cancellation of the penalty and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. This case underscores the importance of considering reasonable time frames for compliance with statutory notices before imposing penalties under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 16:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1687 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177457</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi ruled in an appeal against a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for non-compliance with a notice issued under Section 142(1)/143(2). The tribunal found the time provided for compliance inadequate, as less than ten days were allowed from notice issuance to respond to a detailed questionnaire. Due to the insufficient time granted, the tribunal deemed the non-compliance not a justifiable default warranting the penalty, leading to the cancellation of the penalty and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. This case underscores the importance of considering reasonable time frames for compliance with statutory notices before imposing penalties under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>