<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>excise for diffrence mrp.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109693</link>
    <description>Where a product is not specified for MRP-based valuation under Section 4A and the relevant notification, a manufacturer cannot treat MRP as the basis for excise valuation and cannot lawfully adopt different MRPs for excise purposes; opting for MRP valuation in such circumstances creates a likelihood of short payment of duty and attracts separate penalties for adopting Section 4A in place of Section 4.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 14:42:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>excise for diffrence mrp.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109693</link>
      <description>Where a product is not specified for MRP-based valuation under Section 4A and the relevant notification, a manufacturer cannot treat MRP as the basis for excise valuation and cannot lawfully adopt different MRPs for excise purposes; opting for MRP valuation in such circumstances creates a likelihood of short payment of duty and attracts separate penalties for adopting Section 4A in place of Section 4.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 14:42:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>