<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 216 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order under Section 153A/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, finding it correctly made. It ruled that the capital account balance received on retirement was not taxable as it did not involve a transfer of capital assets. Exemptions under specific sections were deemed applicable, and allegations of tax evasion through colorable devices were rejected. The Tribunal determined there was no double taxation on the revaluation of land and disallowed reliance on a statement made during search and seizure operations. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, with certain additions to the assessment order not being justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 216 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order under Section 153A/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, finding it correctly made. It ruled that the capital account balance received on retirement was not taxable as it did not involve a transfer of capital assets. Exemptions under specific sections were deemed applicable, and allegations of tax evasion through colorable devices were rejected. The Tribunal determined there was no double taxation on the revaluation of land and disallowed reliance on a statement made during search and seizure operations. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, with certain additions to the assessment order not being justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>