<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 611 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177445</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting exemption under sections 10(22) and 10(23C) for the relevant assessment years. Additionally, the tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to evaluate the claim for exemption under section 11 on its merits, acknowledging the delayed submission of the audit report. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial precedents and directives from higher authorities when determining eligibility for exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 611 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177445</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting exemption under sections 10(22) and 10(23C) for the relevant assessment years. Additionally, the tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to evaluate the claim for exemption under section 11 on its merits, acknowledging the delayed submission of the audit report. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to judicial precedents and directives from higher authorities when determining eligibility for exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>