<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1025 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177442</link>
    <description>The writ petition was allowed, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the appeal on its merits. The Court set aside the dismissal of the appeal due to delay, emphasizing that any decision in favor of the petitioner by the Commissioner (Appeals) would be binding unless overturned by a higher forum. No costs were awarded, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1025 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177442</link>
      <description>The writ petition was allowed, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the appeal on its merits. The Court set aside the dismissal of the appeal due to delay, emphasizing that any decision in favor of the petitioner by the Commissioner (Appeals) would be binding unless overturned by a higher forum. No costs were awarded, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>