<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 944 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177422</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s obligation to verify the date of allotment of shares for precise classification of capital gain. The court overturned previous decisions favoring the assessee, remanding the case for further scrutiny to ascertain the accuracy of the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings on the date of allotment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 944 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177422</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s obligation to verify the date of allotment of shares for precise classification of capital gain. The court overturned previous decisions favoring the assessee, remanding the case for further scrutiny to ascertain the accuracy of the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings on the date of allotment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>