<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 974 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction under section 80 IC despite the initial mention of section 80 IB. It was held that the assessee fulfilled the conditions for substantial expansion, qualifying for the benefit under section 80 IC. The Tribunal emphasized a liberal construction of the provisions as incentive measures. The appeal of the revenue was partly allowed, dismissing the grounds raised by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 974 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction under section 80 IC despite the initial mention of section 80 IB. It was held that the assessee fulfilled the conditions for substantial expansion, qualifying for the benefit under section 80 IC. The Tribunal emphasized a liberal construction of the provisions as incentive measures. The appeal of the revenue was partly allowed, dismissing the grounds raised by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>