<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 727 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177401</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai favored the applicants by waiving the pre-deposit of the service tax demanded, penalty imposed, and considering the arguments presented regarding the disallowed input service tax credit. The decision underscored the importance of providing evidence and legal justifications to support claims related to tax credits and penalties in indirect tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 727 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177401</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai favored the applicants by waiving the pre-deposit of the service tax demanded, penalty imposed, and considering the arguments presented regarding the disallowed input service tax credit. The decision underscored the importance of providing evidence and legal justifications to support claims related to tax credits and penalties in indirect tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>