<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision to refund pre-deposits in cash instead of crediting them to the CENVAT account, emphasizing the discretionary nature of such refunds. Interest was granted to the respondent for the belated refund under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, following a similar Supreme Court judgment. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, and the courts upheld the cash refund and interest accrual decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision to refund pre-deposits in cash instead of crediting them to the CENVAT account, emphasizing the discretionary nature of such refunds. Interest was granted to the respondent for the belated refund under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, following a similar Supreme Court judgment. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, and the courts upheld the cash refund and interest accrual decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>