https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177362 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal concerning alleged clandestine removal of goods. The appellant contested the shortage in stock, arguing discrepancies were minimal and lacked concrete evidence of actual removal. The tribunal found the weighment method inaccurate due to variations in average weights for different bundle sizes. Norms for proving clandestine removal were not met, and the charge was deemed unproven based on insufficient evidence beyond average weighment. The tribunal set aside the order, granting relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:05:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177362 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal concerning alleged clandestine removal of goods. The appellant contested the shortage in stock, arguing discrepancies were minimal and lacked concrete evidence of actual removal. The tribunal found the weighment method inaccurate due to variations in average weights for different bundle sizes. Norms for proving clandestine removal were not met, and the charge was deemed unproven based on insufficient evidence beyond average weighment. The tribunal set aside the order, granting relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177362