<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 74 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, determining that the appellants did not provide taxable services under the categorized service types. Consequently, the demands for service tax, interest, and penalties were dismissed. The Tribunal stressed the need to view the contract holistically rather than dissecting it for tax purposes, highlighting the appellants&#039; primary function of generating electricity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 74 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, determining that the appellants did not provide taxable services under the categorized service types. Consequently, the demands for service tax, interest, and penalties were dismissed. The Tribunal stressed the need to view the contract holistically rather than dissecting it for tax purposes, highlighting the appellants&#039; primary function of generating electricity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>