<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 116 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no prima facie case for a complete waiver of pre-deposit in a case involving a stay application against the demand of inadmissible credit of duty and penalty on a company for availing and utilizing inadmissible Cenvat credit. The company&#039;s argument that certain common input services were covered under the definition of input service was not accepted by the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit a specified amount towards duty within a set timeframe, with a waiver from the pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalty, subject to compliance, failing which would lead to vacation of the stay and dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 116 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no prima facie case for a complete waiver of pre-deposit in a case involving a stay application against the demand of inadmissible credit of duty and penalty on a company for availing and utilizing inadmissible Cenvat credit. The company&#039;s argument that certain common input services were covered under the definition of input service was not accepted by the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit a specified amount towards duty within a set timeframe, with a waiver from the pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalty, subject to compliance, failing which would lead to vacation of the stay and dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>