<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 297 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270505</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and then dismissed the appeal. The text does not set out any substantive legal reasoning or wider principle beyond the procedural disposal recorded in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 297 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270505</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and then dismissed the appeal. The text does not set out any substantive legal reasoning or wider principle beyond the procedural disposal recorded in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>