<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 294 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the duty amount deposited by the appellant in adjudication proceedings complied with section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, fulfilling the deposit requirement for appeal rights. Emphasizing legislative intent, the Tribunal discharged the show cause notice, listing the appeal for disposal. The decision underscored the Tribunal&#039;s adherence to statutory mandates and prevention of undue restrictions on appeal rights due to excessive deposit requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 294 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the duty amount deposited by the appellant in adjudication proceedings complied with section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, fulfilling the deposit requirement for appeal rights. Emphasizing legislative intent, the Tribunal discharged the show cause notice, listing the appeal for disposal. The decision underscored the Tribunal&#039;s adherence to statutory mandates and prevention of undue restrictions on appeal rights due to excessive deposit requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>