<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 293 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270501</link>
    <description>An area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE turns on whether commercial production actually commenced by the specified cut-off date. The governing test is the start of commercial production, not the existence of fully saleable finished goods or completed sales before that date. On the facts discussed, the State certificate recorded commencement of commercial production on 31.3.2010, and supporting material from the original authority corroborated that finding. Objections relating to incomplete plant installation, power supply, raw material, and alleged manipulation were not sufficient to displace the record. The absence of commercial sales before 31.3.2010 did not negate eligibility for the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 293 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270501</link>
      <description>An area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE turns on whether commercial production actually commenced by the specified cut-off date. The governing test is the start of commercial production, not the existence of fully saleable finished goods or completed sales before that date. On the facts discussed, the State certificate recorded commencement of commercial production on 31.3.2010, and supporting material from the original authority corroborated that finding. Objections relating to incomplete plant installation, power supply, raw material, and alleged manipulation were not sufficient to displace the record. The absence of commercial sales before 31.3.2010 did not negate eligibility for the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>