<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 649 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177351</link>
    <description>The appellant was acquitted of charges under Sections 302 and 365 IPC as the High Court&#039;s reliance on various circumstances, including last seen evidence, recovery of the silver chain, absconding of co-accused, confessional statements, extra-judicial confession, recovery of the dead body, and medical evidence, did not implicate the appellant. The appellant&#039;s confession was retracted, inconsistent with medical evidence, and the extra-judicial confession lacked credibility. The recovery of the dead body and medical evidence further cast doubt on the appellant&#039;s involvement, leading to the setting aside of the conviction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 649 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177351</link>
      <description>The appellant was acquitted of charges under Sections 302 and 365 IPC as the High Court&#039;s reliance on various circumstances, including last seen evidence, recovery of the silver chain, absconding of co-accused, confessional statements, extra-judicial confession, recovery of the dead body, and medical evidence, did not implicate the appellant. The appellant&#039;s confession was retracted, inconsistent with medical evidence, and the extra-judicial confession lacked credibility. The recovery of the dead body and medical evidence further cast doubt on the appellant&#039;s involvement, leading to the setting aside of the conviction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>