<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 581 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177330</link>
    <description>Judicial review of an administrative circular was declined where the Delhi, Gujarat and Calcutta High Courts had already quashed Circular No. 38/2000-Cus dated 10 May 2000. The Supreme Court noted that Special Leave Petitions against the Gujarat judgment had been dismissed and those against the Calcutta judgment had been withdrawn, and found no reason to reopen the validity of the circular in light of those prior outcomes. The appeals were dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 581 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177330</link>
      <description>Judicial review of an administrative circular was declined where the Delhi, Gujarat and Calcutta High Courts had already quashed Circular No. 38/2000-Cus dated 10 May 2000. The Supreme Court noted that Special Leave Petitions against the Gujarat judgment had been dismissed and those against the Calcutta judgment had been withdrawn, and found no reason to reopen the validity of the circular in light of those prior outcomes. The appeals were dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>