<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 855 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177306</link>
    <description>The Court found that the authorities&#039; estimations of the appellant&#039;s business profit without considering evidence from earlier returns were baseless. The orders were deemed unsustainable, and the matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the appellant, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:37:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 855 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177306</link>
      <description>The Court found that the authorities&#039; estimations of the appellant&#039;s business profit without considering evidence from earlier returns were baseless. The orders were deemed unsustainable, and the matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the appellant, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>