<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 31 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1844</link>
    <description>Small-scale industry exemption from service tax on goods transport operator services was unavailable where the assessee itself later stated that it was only a trading company and had not carried on manufacturing activity at the relevant premises; the exemption notifications applied only to the specified class of small-scale industrial units, so the factual basis for entitlement was not proved. After retrospective validation of the levy and the introduction of the special return mechanism under Section 71A and Rule 7A, recovery had to proceed under the amended scheme, and a demand based only on a pre-amendment notice under Section 73 could not be sustained because it did not conform to the revised legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 31 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1844</link>
      <description>Small-scale industry exemption from service tax on goods transport operator services was unavailable where the assessee itself later stated that it was only a trading company and had not carried on manufacturing activity at the relevant premises; the exemption notifications applied only to the specified class of small-scale industrial units, so the factual basis for entitlement was not proved. After retrospective validation of the levy and the introduction of the special return mechanism under Section 71A and Rule 7A, recovery had to proceed under the amended scheme, and a demand based only on a pre-amendment notice under Section 73 could not be sustained because it did not conform to the revised legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>