<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1116 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 28.08 lakhs addition as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no fault in the analysis, emphasizing the relevance of legal precedents and specific case circumstances. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the disallowance. The judgment was pronounced on 5th March 2015 by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:37:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1116 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 28.08 lakhs addition as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no fault in the analysis, emphasizing the relevance of legal precedents and specific case circumstances. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the disallowance. The judgment was pronounced on 5th March 2015 by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>