<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 836 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177327</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit order of Rs. 1.5 lakhs, directing the petitioner to deposit the amount within eight weeks for the appeals to be heard promptly. The court found the pre-deposit was justified based on specific reasons and declined to interfere with the CESTAT&#039;s decision. Compliance with the order was deemed crucial for the appeals to proceed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and fulfilling financial obligations for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:37:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 836 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177327</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit order of Rs. 1.5 lakhs, directing the petitioner to deposit the amount within eight weeks for the appeals to be heard promptly. The court found the pre-deposit was justified based on specific reasons and declined to interfere with the CESTAT&#039;s decision. Compliance with the order was deemed crucial for the appeals to proceed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and fulfilling financial obligations for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>