<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270485</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2012-13 under the TNVAT Act, finding that the demand for differential ITC at 3% was unauthorized before November 2013 and that the petitioner&#039;s objections were not considered, violating natural justice. The matter was remanded to the respondent for proper consideration within six weeks, ensuring due opportunity for the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, concluding the legal judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270485</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2012-13 under the TNVAT Act, finding that the demand for differential ITC at 3% was unauthorized before November 2013 and that the petitioner&#039;s objections were not considered, violating natural justice. The matter was remanded to the respondent for proper consideration within six weeks, ensuring due opportunity for the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, concluding the legal judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>