<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 269 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty, interest, and penalties on the manufacturing company for wrongly availing Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption by not clubbing the clearance value of their Bangalore unit with the Daman unit. The appellant&#039;s argument of the demand being time-barred was considered, and penalties imposed on the Director and Factory Manager were reviewed, resulting in a reduced penalty for the Director and setting aside the penalty for the Factory Manager. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of the exemption notification, the limitation period, and the roles of the individuals involved in the non-disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:45:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 269 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty, interest, and penalties on the manufacturing company for wrongly availing Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption by not clubbing the clearance value of their Bangalore unit with the Daman unit. The appellant&#039;s argument of the demand being time-barred was considered, and penalties imposed on the Director and Factory Manager were reviewed, resulting in a reduced penalty for the Director and setting aside the penalty for the Factory Manager. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of the exemption notification, the limitation period, and the roles of the individuals involved in the non-disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>