<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 259 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority for denovo adjudication, emphasizing the need to establish nexus between the services and export goods through corroborative documents. The judgment underscored the importance of verifying payment details, establishing correlations, and considering procedural conditions as directory rather than mandatory for refund eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:45:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 259 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority for denovo adjudication, emphasizing the need to establish nexus between the services and export goods through corroborative documents. The judgment underscored the importance of verifying payment details, establishing correlations, and considering procedural conditions as directory rather than mandatory for refund eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>