<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270461</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to treat the gains as capital gains, based on the rule of consistency, and exempting the profit on the sale of agricultural land due to its classification as agricultural land. Ground No.4 was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270461</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to treat the gains as capital gains, based on the rule of consistency, and exempting the profit on the sale of agricultural land due to its classification as agricultural land. Ground No.4 was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>