<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 248 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the genuine nature of the transactions and the relationship between the appellant and his son as principal and agent. Compliance with rule 6DD(k) exceptions was acknowledged, leading to the deletion of the addition under section 40A(3) for the assessment year 2009-10. The decision aligned with legal principles and overturned the disallowance confirmed by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 248 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the genuine nature of the transactions and the relationship between the appellant and his son as principal and agent. Compliance with rule 6DD(k) exceptions was acknowledged, leading to the deletion of the addition under section 40A(3) for the assessment year 2009-10. The decision aligned with legal principles and overturned the disallowance confirmed by the ld. CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>