<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 506 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177303</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer (AO) to issue a notice under section 143(2) or extend the limitation period for such notices. The directions were deemed invalid and void. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the directions by the CIT (Appeals) to issue a notice under section 143(2) and complete the assessment under section 143(3) were deleted and expunged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:24:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 506 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177303</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer (AO) to issue a notice under section 143(2) or extend the limitation period for such notices. The directions were deemed invalid and void. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the directions by the CIT (Appeals) to issue a notice under section 143(2) and complete the assessment under section 143(3) were deleted and expunged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>