<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 854 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177297</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed both appeals related to the deletion of disallowance on excess depreciation on computer peripherals and the restriction of disallowance under section 14A. The ITAT upheld the deletion of excess depreciation disallowance by the CIT(A) but remanded the matter of disallowance under section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision with specific details. The ITAT rejected interference with penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) at that stage. The order was pronounced on 31 May 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 854 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177297</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed both appeals related to the deletion of disallowance on excess depreciation on computer peripherals and the restriction of disallowance under section 14A. The ITAT upheld the deletion of excess depreciation disallowance by the CIT(A) but remanded the matter of disallowance under section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision with specific details. The ITAT rejected interference with penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) at that stage. The order was pronounced on 31 May 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>