<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 59 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1836</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on scrap inputs was denied because the supplier&#039;s certificate and sale documents did not establish the exact duty paid or the rate of duty, and the assessee produced no documentary evidence proving duty payment on the inputs. The Tribunal held that there was no provision permitting deemed credit for item No. 7204 under Order No. 342/1/88-TRU dated 20-5-88, so credit was inadmissible and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 59 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1836</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on scrap inputs was denied because the supplier&#039;s certificate and sale documents did not establish the exact duty paid or the rate of duty, and the assessee produced no documentary evidence proving duty payment on the inputs. The Tribunal held that there was no provision permitting deemed credit for item No. 7204 under Order No. 342/1/88-TRU dated 20-5-88, so credit was inadmissible and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>