<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 616 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, dismissing grounds related to search analysis rejection, inappropriate comparables selection, and penalty proceedings initiation. It upheld correct margins of comparable companies and ALP computation, resulting in no transfer pricing adjustment. Emphasizing the importance of contemporaneous data, the Tribunal upheld the TPO&#039;s methodology while excluding inappropriate comparables. The order was pronounced on October 31, 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 616 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, dismissing grounds related to search analysis rejection, inappropriate comparables selection, and penalty proceedings initiation. It upheld correct margins of comparable companies and ALP computation, resulting in no transfer pricing adjustment. Emphasizing the importance of contemporaneous data, the Tribunal upheld the TPO&#039;s methodology while excluding inappropriate comparables. The order was pronounced on October 31, 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>