https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1834 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the seized grey fabrics were not intended for clandestine removal. The lack of evidence and the explanation provided by the company representatives supported the appellants' position that the goods were rejected items stored temporarily. The Tribunal concluded that the absence of a reject register did not undermine the appellants' explanation, ultimately setting aside the orders and granting relief to the appellants. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1834 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the seized grey fabrics were not intended for clandestine removal. The lack of evidence and the explanation provided by the company representatives supported the appellants' position that the goods were rejected items stored temporarily. The Tribunal concluded that the absence of a reject register did not undermine the appellants' explanation, ultimately setting aside the orders and granting relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1834