<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 58 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177274</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals as the plaintiffs failed to substantiate their claims of title based on occupancy tenancy rights, oral arrangements, possession, and interpretation of relevant regulations. The court emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the plaintiffs&#039; case and the failure to establish ownership and continuity of possession over the disputed lands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 58 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177274</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals as the plaintiffs failed to substantiate their claims of title based on occupancy tenancy rights, oral arrangements, possession, and interpretation of relevant regulations. The court emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the plaintiffs&#039; case and the failure to establish ownership and continuity of possession over the disputed lands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>