https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177272 A signed and verified pleading in earlier litigation is admissible as an admission under Section 17 of the Evidence Act and may be relied on in later proceedings, though it is not conclusive and can be accepted in part. On the facts, the earlier plaint was accepted to establish that Ramyad Singh died in 1939, while the inconsistent statement about surrender of the widow's estate was rejected. That finding entitled the widow to a share in the joint family estate and to maintain the partition suit under the Hindu Women's Rights to Property legislation. After she became full owner under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, the transferee purchaser was entitled to the benefit of Order XXII Rule 10 CPC and to allotment of the purchased lands in partition. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:19:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177272 A signed and verified pleading in earlier litigation is admissible as an admission under Section 17 of the Evidence Act and may be relied on in later proceedings, though it is not conclusive and can be accepted in part. On the facts, the earlier plaint was accepted to establish that Ramyad Singh died in 1939, while the inconsistent statement about surrender of the widow's estate was rejected. That finding entitled the widow to a share in the joint family estate and to maintain the partition suit under the Hindu Women's Rights to Property legislation. After she became full owner under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, the transferee purchaser was entitled to the benefit of Order XXII Rule 10 CPC and to allotment of the purchased lands in partition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177272