<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 113 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1832</link>
    <description>Balance Cenvat credit on capital goods in the succeeding year is available only if the statutory condition of continued possession and use is satisfied; where the fixtures had been removed and were no longer available, the credit was disallowed. The demand was sustained because the assessee&#039;s returns and records did not amount to a separate disclosure capable of negating wrongful availment, while the penalty was held excessive and reduced to a token amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 113 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1832</link>
      <description>Balance Cenvat credit on capital goods in the succeeding year is available only if the statutory condition of continued possession and use is satisfied; where the fixtures had been removed and were no longer available, the credit was disallowed. The demand was sustained because the assessee&#039;s returns and records did not amount to a separate disclosure capable of negating wrongful availment, while the penalty was held excessive and reduced to a token amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>