<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 96 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1830</link>
    <description>For bulk liquid cargo discharged through pipelines into shore tanks, customs duty is to be assessed on the quantity actually received in the shore tank, not on the higher quantity shown in the ship&#039;s ullage survey. CESTAT Bangalore applied the settled principle and noted that the Board circular supported shore-tank-based assessment where cargo is discharged into storage tanks. Assessment finalised solely on ship ullage was therefore incorrect, and refund was admissible for duty collected on the excess ullage quantity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 96 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1830</link>
      <description>For bulk liquid cargo discharged through pipelines into shore tanks, customs duty is to be assessed on the quantity actually received in the shore tank, not on the higher quantity shown in the ship&#039;s ullage survey. CESTAT Bangalore applied the settled principle and noted that the Board circular supported shore-tank-based assessment where cargo is discharged into storage tanks. Assessment finalised solely on ship ullage was therefore incorrect, and refund was admissible for duty collected on the excess ullage quantity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>