<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 529 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177268</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the order allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order for the assessment year 2004-05. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was justified, as the alleged bogus investors had been identified with detailed information. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s finding did not give rise to any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs for either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 20:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 529 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177268</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the order allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order for the assessment year 2004-05. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was justified, as the alleged bogus investors had been identified with detailed information. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s finding did not give rise to any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs for either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>