<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 223 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270431</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on disallowance of refund of tuition fees paid in cash, reducing the disallowance amounts based on substantial evidence provided by the assessee. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance to be excessive and upheld the appellate authorities&#039; decisions. Regarding the disallowance of interest on loans and advances to friends and relatives, the High Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance, emphasizing the sufficiency of the assessee&#039;s own capital to cover interest-free advances. The court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order and dismissed both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 223 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270431</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on disallowance of refund of tuition fees paid in cash, reducing the disallowance amounts based on substantial evidence provided by the assessee. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance to be excessive and upheld the appellate authorities&#039; decisions. Regarding the disallowance of interest on loans and advances to friends and relatives, the High Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance, emphasizing the sufficiency of the assessee&#039;s own capital to cover interest-free advances. The court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order and dismissed both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>