<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 218 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 14A related to dividend income. The decision emphasized the lack of proper reasoning for invoking Rule 8D and highlighted the importance of establishing a clear nexus between expenditure and income. The judgment underscored the necessity for Assessing Officers to adhere to due process and provide justifications before applying specific rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 218 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance under section 14A related to dividend income. The decision emphasized the lack of proper reasoning for invoking Rule 8D and highlighted the importance of establishing a clear nexus between expenditure and income. The judgment underscored the necessity for Assessing Officers to adhere to due process and provide justifications before applying specific rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>