<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 210 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270418</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee against the Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Kolkata&#039;s order under section 25(2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal found that the debt issue was appropriately considered in the assessment, leading to a reversal of the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of accurately accounting for debts in determining net wealth for assessment purposes under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 210 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270418</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee against the Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Kolkata&#039;s order under section 25(2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal found that the debt issue was appropriately considered in the assessment, leading to a reversal of the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of accurately accounting for debts in determining net wealth for assessment purposes under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>