<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 207 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided for the construction of a power plant did not qualify as &quot;consulting engineer services&quot; and were not subject to service tax during the relevant period. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected based on precedents and a CBEC Circular, determining the services were not taxable as consulting engineer services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 207 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided for the construction of a power plant did not qualify as &quot;consulting engineer services&quot; and were not subject to service tax during the relevant period. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected based on precedents and a CBEC Circular, determining the services were not taxable as consulting engineer services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>