<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 204 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability on reclassification of products under Chapter 39 for six months before the show-cause notice issuance. Demands from April 1993 to March 1997 were set aside due to limitation. No penalties imposed as classification lists were approved without dispute. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 204 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability on reclassification of products under Chapter 39 for six months before the show-cause notice issuance. Demands from April 1993 to March 1997 were set aside due to limitation. No penalties imposed as classification lists were approved without dispute. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>