<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 196 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving duty liability on excess quantity of pan masala cleared. The Tribunal emphasized that duty should be assessed under Section 4A based on MRP less abatement, noting that the excess weight in the pouches did not impact duty calculation. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to uphold duty demand under a different provision was overturned, highlighting the necessity of applying the correct duty payment method. The penalty aspect under Section 11AC was not extensively discussed as the focus was on duty liability and assessment method under Section 4A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 196 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving duty liability on excess quantity of pan masala cleared. The Tribunal emphasized that duty should be assessed under Section 4A based on MRP less abatement, noting that the excess weight in the pouches did not impact duty calculation. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to uphold duty demand under a different provision was overturned, highlighting the necessity of applying the correct duty payment method. The penalty aspect under Section 11AC was not extensively discussed as the focus was on duty liability and assessment method under Section 4A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>