<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 193 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order by the Commissioner and remanded the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of detailed analysis and proper application of legal provisions in related party transactions and Central Excise valuation rules. The lower authorities were found to have not adequately considered the appellant&#039;s defenses and relevant legal provisions, necessitating a reassessment with a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 193 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order by the Commissioner and remanded the case for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of detailed analysis and proper application of legal provisions in related party transactions and Central Excise valuation rules. The lower authorities were found to have not adequately considered the appellant&#039;s defenses and relevant legal provisions, necessitating a reassessment with a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>