https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270398 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving misdeclaration of imported goods as Ceramic Floor Tiles instead of vitrified tiles subject to anti-dumping duty. The goods were liable for confiscation under Customs Act sections 111(d) and 111(m). The Commissioner upheld the confiscation, imposed a fine of 6 lakhs, and a penalty under Section 112(a). The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from 6 lakhs to 4 lakhs and the penalty from 2 lakhs to 1 lakh, considering the payment of anti-dumping duty before the show cause notice. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270398 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving misdeclaration of imported goods as Ceramic Floor Tiles instead of vitrified tiles subject to anti-dumping duty. The goods were liable for confiscation under Customs Act sections 111(d) and 111(m). The Commissioner upheld the confiscation, imposed a fine of 6 lakhs, and a penalty under Section 112(a). The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from 6 lakhs to 4 lakhs and the penalty from 2 lakhs to 1 lakh, considering the payment of anti-dumping duty before the show cause notice. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270398