<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 186 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270394</link>
    <description>The court set aside the assessment order under the TNVAT Act for the assessment year 2013-14, remitting the matter back to the respondent for a fresh assessment. The petitioner&#039;s objections and revised return were not adequately considered before the initial order was passed. The court directed the petitioner to pay 15% of the tax amount and instructed the respondent to reassess the tax liability and penalty imposition after affording a fair hearing and considering the petitioner&#039;s submissions. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the importance of due consideration of the petitioner&#039;s objections in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 186 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270394</link>
      <description>The court set aside the assessment order under the TNVAT Act for the assessment year 2013-14, remitting the matter back to the respondent for a fresh assessment. The petitioner&#039;s objections and revised return were not adequately considered before the initial order was passed. The court directed the petitioner to pay 15% of the tax amount and instructed the respondent to reassess the tax liability and penalty imposition after affording a fair hearing and considering the petitioner&#039;s submissions. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the importance of due consideration of the petitioner&#039;s objections in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>