<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1017 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177258</link>
    <description>Delay of more than eight years in filing an appeal against an ex parte adjudication order was condoned where the record did not show due service of the show cause notice or the adjudication order on the appellant or the erstwhile company. The appellant supported the explanation by affidavit and stated that knowledge of the proceedings arose only on receipt of the public demand notice. The tribunal treated the explanation as bona fide and sufficient, and the discrepancy in the figures on record also indicated that the matter required examination on merits. The condonation application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:53:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1017 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177258</link>
      <description>Delay of more than eight years in filing an appeal against an ex parte adjudication order was condoned where the record did not show due service of the show cause notice or the adjudication order on the appellant or the erstwhile company. The appellant supported the explanation by affidavit and stated that knowledge of the proceedings arose only on receipt of the public demand notice. The tribunal treated the explanation as bona fide and sufficient, and the discrepancy in the figures on record also indicated that the matter required examination on merits. The condonation application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>