<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1216 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the assessee&#039;s eligibility as a SEZ Unit under sub-section 6 of section 115JB, ruling that physical presence within an SEZ was not mandatory for claiming the exemption. Emphasizing compliance with SEZ rules and reporting authority, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was grounded in the interpretation of the SEZ Act&#039;s definition of &#039;Unit&#039; and the disjunctive use in the Income Tax Act, supporting the assessee&#039;s position and denying the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1216 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the assessee&#039;s eligibility as a SEZ Unit under sub-section 6 of section 115JB, ruling that physical presence within an SEZ was not mandatory for claiming the exemption. Emphasizing compliance with SEZ rules and reporting authority, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was grounded in the interpretation of the SEZ Act&#039;s definition of &#039;Unit&#039; and the disjunctive use in the Income Tax Act, supporting the assessee&#039;s position and denying the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>