<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1010 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177239</link>
    <description>The tribunal determined that the appellant, classified as a primary co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, was not entitled to deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. As the appellant accepted deposits from the general public and met the specified criteria, Section 80P(4) applied, disqualifying them from the claimed deductions. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1010 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177239</link>
      <description>The tribunal determined that the appellant, classified as a primary co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, was not entitled to deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. As the appellant accepted deposits from the general public and met the specified criteria, Section 80P(4) applied, disqualifying them from the claimed deductions. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>